Vote YES · state

45

MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

What it does

Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars-potentially exceeding $100 million-annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

Why Thrive LA supports 45

Proposition 45 overhauls the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to speed up permitting for housing, transportation, water, clean energy, hospitals, schools, broadband, and wildfire mitigation projects. It imposes hard deadlines on agencies (365 business days for a full environmental impact report), caps public comment periods, limits alternatives analysis to one applicant-proposed option, locks in rules at the time of application, and restricts courts from halting entire projects over partial CEQA violations. Project applicants can opt into the new process or stick with existing procedures. CEQA is the single largest regulatory barrier to building in California. It does not protect the environment so much as it arms litigation against the people who build, hire, and invest in this state. Proponents estimate CEQA adds $75,000 or more to the cost of every new home. That cost lands directly on renters, homebuyers, and small property owners. Every year of delay inflates construction budgets, kills marginal projects, and ensures fewer units reach the market. Proposition 45 attacks the problem at the root: time, uncertainty, and litigation risk. The measure's coalition tells you everything. The California Chamber of Commerce, Building Industry Association, Business Roundtable, California Hospital Association, California Council for Affordable Housing, and the California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce are all leading supporters. The opposition is led by the Sierra Club, the Center for Biological Diversity, and an array of environmental litigation organizations whose business model depends on the current system. Their objection is not that CEQA works well. It is that Proposition 45 would make it harder for them to block projects. Short-term government implementation costs, estimated by the Legislative Analyst's Office at potentially $100 million annually, are partially offset by applicant fees and dwarfed by the long-term savings from faster public construction timelines, reduced litigation costs, and increased property tax and economic activity from completed projects. This is not a spending measure. It creates no new entitlements, no new taxes, and no new bureaucracies. It is a structural reform to how California processes permits. Vote yes on Proposition 45. It is the most consequential pro-housing, pro-growth measure on the 2026 ballot.

Key points

  • Hard Deadlines on Bureaucracy: Agencies get 365 business days to complete a full environmental impact report and 30 days to determine application completeness. No more indefinite review timelines that kill projects through delay.
  • Ends Litigation-as-Obstruction: Proposition 45 restricts the scope of judicial review and prevents courts from halting entire projects over partial CEQA violations. This removes the primary weapon used to block housing and infrastructure through endless lawsuits.
  • Protects Housing Providers' Investment: The measure locks in rules at the time of application, so agencies cannot move the goalposts during review. Developers and small property owners can plan and invest with certainty rather than absorbing years of shifting requirements.
  • No New Taxes or Spending Programs: Implementation costs are partially covered by applicant fees. The measure creates no new entitlements, no ongoing spending programs, and no tax increases. Long-term fiscal effects are likely positive as faster project completion reduces public construction costs and increases tax revenue.
  • Broad Economic Impact Across Sectors: The expedited review track covers eight major sectors: housing, transportation, water, clean energy, healthcare, education, broadband, and public safety infrastructure including fire stations and wildfire mitigation projects. Every sector that builds in California benefits.

See your full ballot

Get a personalized voter guide with every endorsed race + measure on your June 2 ballot.

Get your full voter guide