Vote NO · city
EE
CITY ETHICS, ELECTIONS, AND GOVERNANCE. CHARTER AMENDMENT EE.
What it does
Shall the City Charter be amended to: increase the authority of the Police Department Inspector General and Fire Department Independent Assessor; prohibit Ethics Commissioners from running for certain elected offices for five years; increase penalties for campaign finance violations; require City Council to meet at least weekly rather than the currently required three days per week; increase referendum petition signature requirements; and make other changes regarding ethics, elections and governance?
Why Thrive LA opposes EE
Measure EE is a City Charter amendment packaged as ethics and governance reform. It bundles several unrelated changes into a single ballot question: strengthening the independence of the LAPD Inspector General and LAFD Independent Assessor, imposing a five-year cooling-off period before Ethics Commissioners can run for city office, raising maximum campaign finance penalties from $2,000 to $15,000 per violation, reducing the City Council's minimum meeting requirement from three days per week to just once per week, and raising the signature threshold for citizen referendum petitions from 10% to 15% of votes cast in the last mayoral election. Some of these provisions are reasonable on their own. Preventing police and fire commissions from blocking Inspector General investigations is a genuine improvement. Higher penalties for campaign finance violations bring enforcement closer to meaningful deterrence. And a cooling-off period for Ethics Commissioners seeking office closes an obvious revolving door. But the measure buries two significant governance rollbacks inside a package designed to look like reform. Reducing Council meeting requirements from three days per week to one gives the City Council permission to do less legislative work with less public scrutiny. Los Angeles is a city of four million people with a $13 billion budget. Cutting the minimum floor for Council sessions is a step backward for transparency and accountability, not forward. More troubling is the 50% increase in referendum petition signature thresholds. The referendum is one of the few tools residents have to challenge bad ordinances after the Council passes them. Raising the bar from 10% to 15% makes it materially harder for ordinary Angelenos to hold their elected officials accountable. That is not ethics reform. It is incumbent protection. When good policy is bundled with provisions that reduce citizen power and legislative accountability, the responsible vote is no. Voters should reject Measure EE and demand these proposals come back as separate, honest questions.
Key points
- Weakens Citizen Referendum Power: Raising the referendum signature threshold from 10% to 15% makes it 50% harder for residents to challenge ordinances passed by the City Council. This is one of the few direct accountability tools voters have, and Measure EE would significantly dilute it.
- Lets Council Meet Less: Reducing the City Council's minimum meeting requirement from three days per week to one day per week lowers the floor for legislative activity and public oversight. A city with a $13 billion budget and four million residents deserves more transparency, not less.
- Omnibus Packaging Obscures Tradeoffs: Bundling genuinely useful provisions (stronger Inspector General independence, higher campaign finance penalties) with rollbacks to citizen power forces voters into an all-or-nothing choice. Each of these changes deserves a separate, transparent vote.
- Inspector General Independence Is Real: The provision preventing the Police and Fire Commissions from blocking investigations by the Inspector General and Independent Assessor is a legitimate reform. It should return to the ballot on its own merits, not as cover for weaker accountability elsewhere in the measure.
- No Fiscal Cost, Real Democratic Cost: Measure EE imposes no new taxes or fees. But fiscal neutrality does not make a measure harmless. The democratic cost of raising barriers to citizen referendums and lowering expectations for Council participation is substantial.
See your full ballot
Get a personalized voter guide with every endorsed race + measure on your June 2 ballot.
Get your full voter guide