Vote NO · city
LA
CITY INFRASTRUCTURE, BUDGET, FINANCE, AND CONTRACTING. CHARTER AMENDMENT LA.
What it does
Shall the City Charter be amended to: establish a capital infrastructure plan and two-year budget cycle for the City; increase the authority of the Director of Public Works and allow for the elimination of or changes to the Board of Public Works; remove restrictions prohibiting the City from engaging in business enterprises and mortgaging City-owned property; and change certain contracting rules and procedures?
Why Thrive LA opposes LA
Measure LA is a City Charter amendment that would create a capital infrastructure plan, move Los Angeles to a two-year budget cycle, give the Director of Public Works broader authority (while allowing the Board of Public Works to be eliminated by ordinance), remove the city's longstanding prohibition on engaging in business enterprises and mortgaging city-owned property, and loosen competitive bidding requirements for certain contracts. Some of these ideas are sensible on their own. A biennial budget cycle can reduce political churn and improve long-range planning. A capital infrastructure plan brings structure to a city that desperately needs it. Streamlining contracting rules so the city does not lose qualified bidders over minor paperwork defects is common-sense reform. If Measure LA stopped there, it would deserve a closer look. It does not stop there. Buried in the same charter amendment are two provisions that dramatically expand the city's authority to act as a market participant and a borrower. Removing the prohibition on business enterprises means Los Angeles could compete directly with private companies, crowding out the very businesses that create jobs and generate tax revenue. Removing the prohibition on mortgaging city-owned property opens the door to leveraging public assets for debt, exposing taxpayers to liabilities that do not exist today. Proponents note that the California Constitution still requires two-thirds voter approval for mortgage debt, but the charter prohibition is an additional safeguard, and Measure LA strips it away. These are not minor housekeeping changes. They are structural expansions of government power packaged alongside popular reforms to make them easier to swallow. Equally concerning is the delegation problem. The measure allows the Board of Public Works to be eliminated or restructured by future ordinance, meaning the City Council could consolidate executive authority in the Director of Public Works without returning to voters. The capital infrastructure plan's actual parameters would also be set by future ordinance, not by this charter amendment. Voters are being asked to approve a framework and trust elected officials to fill in the details later. That is not accountability. That is a blank check. Vote No on Measure LA.
Key points
- Government Competing With Business: Measure LA removes the charter's prohibition on the city engaging in business enterprises. That means Los Angeles could launch publicly run operations that compete directly with private companies, crowding out investment and distorting markets.
- Mortgaging Public Property: The measure lifts the ban on the city mortgaging city-owned property, opening the door to leveraging public assets for debt. Even with the state Constitution's two-thirds voter approval requirement for mortgage debt, removing this charter-level safeguard increases long-term taxpayer exposure.
- Good Reforms, Bad Packaging: A biennial budget cycle and a capital infrastructure plan are worthwhile ideas. But bundling them with sweeping expansions of government authority forces voters into an all-or-nothing choice. These reforms deserve their own clean measure.
- Blank Check on Oversight: The measure allows the City Council to eliminate or restructure the Board of Public Works by ordinance, without returning to voters. Key details of the capital infrastructure plan are also left to future ordinances. Voters approve the authority; politicians decide how to use it.
- Weakened Competitive Bidding: The measure creates new exceptions to competitive bid requirements for critical infrastructure and software maintenance contracts. While some flexibility is reasonable, loosening competitive bidding rules without stronger oversight invites waste and favoritism.
See your full ballot
Get a personalized voter guide with every endorsed race + measure on your June 2 ballot.
Get your full voter guide