Vote YES · city

PRK

CITY DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS BUDGET. CHARTER AMENDMENT PRK.

What it does

Shall the City Charter be amended to increase the minimum budget allocated to the Department of Recreation and Parks, phased in over ten years until it is double the current minimum budget allocation, with exceptions for fiscal emergencies?

Why Thrive LA supports PRK

Charter Amendment PRK would double the minimum budget guaranteed to the Department of Recreation and Parks over ten years, increasing the mandated share of assessed property value from 0.0325% to 0.065% by fiscal year 2036-37. No new tax is imposed. Instead, the measure locks in an escalating claim on existing General Fund revenue, growing the parks allocation from roughly $303 million to $995 million annually. Thrive LA supports well-maintained parks. They anchor neighborhoods, give families safe outdoor space, and make communities more attractive to investment. Los Angeles parks have been underfunded for decades, and the results are visible: deferred maintenance, shuttered recreation centers, and facilities that have become magnets for encampments rather than for families. A charter-level funding guarantee forces the city to treat parks as essential infrastructure rather than a line item to be raided every budget cycle. The fiscal trade-offs are real. The City Administrative Officer estimates the mandate will require reallocating up to $497 million annually from other General Fund services by 2036-37, including public safety, public works, and homeless services. The city already faces a projected $63 million structural deficit. Those are serious numbers. But they are also a forcing function. For years, City Hall has avoided the hard work of prioritizing spending and eliminating waste. A binding parks mandate compels elected officials to make choices rather than spreading mediocrity across every department. The ten-year phase-in provides time to restructure, and the fiscal emergency exception preserves a safety valve for genuine downturns. The risk is that future councils respond to the squeeze by raising taxes rather than cutting elsewhere. Thrive LA will oppose any new tax or fee justified by this mandate. The correct response to a binding parks floor is to find efficiencies, consolidate duplicative programs, and eliminate low-value spending in other departments. If this measure forces that discipline, it will have done the city a favor. Vote Yes on PRK. Los Angeles parks deserve a funding floor, and Los Angeles taxpayers deserve a city government that can prioritize.

Key points

  • No New Taxes Imposed: PRK does not levy a new tax, fee, or assessment. It reallocates existing General Fund revenue. That distinction matters. The measure increases spending on parks without increasing the burden on residents or businesses.
  • Ten-Year Phase-In Period: The doubling of the parks budget floor occurs gradually over a decade, giving City Hall time to identify offsetting cuts and restructure spending in other departments. This is not an overnight fiscal shock.
  • Fiscal Emergency Safety Valve: The charter amendment allows the city to reduce the parks allocation during a formally declared fiscal emergency. This preserves flexibility during recessions or catastrophic events like the Palisades fires.
  • Watchpoint: No Tax Increases to Backfill: The mandate will create pressure on the General Fund. If elected officials respond by proposing new taxes or fees to maintain other services, Thrive LA will oppose them. The correct response is spending reform, not revenue increases.
  • Watchpoint: Public Safety Budgets: LAPD and LAFD funding must not be treated as the offset. Council members who vote to cut police or fire budgets to comply with this mandate will face accountability from voters and from Thrive LA.

See your full ballot

Get a personalized voter guide with every endorsed race + measure on your June 2 ballot.

Get your full voter guide