Vote YES · city

PRT

CITY AIRPORTS, HARBOR, AND WATER AND POWER DEPARTMENTS. CHARTER AMENDMENT PRT.

What it does

Shall the City Charter be amended to: require the Harbor Department to allocate funds for waterfront public access projects; require disclosure of workforce impacts for certain Harbor Department leases and agreements; increase maximum terms for certain leases; and change the composition requirement for the Airport Commission?

Why Thrive LA supports PRT

Measure PRT amends the City Charter to make four changes across Los Angeles's proprietary departments: it extends maximum lease terms for the Airports Department and Department of Water and Power from 50 to 66 years (matching the Harbor Department's existing authority), adjusts local residency requirements on the Board of Airport Commissioners, requires the Harbor Department to annually fund a Public Access Investment Plan for waterfront projects, and mandates that applicants for Harbor District leases or Coastal Development Permits submit workforce impact disclosures. The strongest provision here is the lease-term extension. Longer lease terms attract private capital by giving investors greater certainty of return, reducing the effective cost of financing airport and utility infrastructure. Aligning all three proprietary departments at 66 years is a sensible, overdue standardization. The Airport Commission residency changes are modest governance housekeeping, ensuring that commissioners actually live near the facilities they oversee. The measure is not without drawbacks. The Public Access Investment Plan codifies an existing Harbor Department practice of spending roughly $28.6 million annually on waterfront access, but embedding it in the Charter rather than leaving it as an administrative decision makes future reallocation far harder. Charter amendments require another citywide vote to undo. The workforce impact disclosure requirement adds a new compliance layer for businesses seeking Harbor District leases. While small businesses and nonprofits may be partially exempted, any added regulatory friction increases the cost of doing business at the Port. On balance, the lease-term extension is a meaningful improvement for long-term infrastructure investment, and the remaining provisions are either neutral or formalize existing practice. The regulatory and fiscal concerns are real but modest enough to support a Yes vote. Vote Yes on Measure PRT.

Key points

  • Longer Leases, More Investment: Extending maximum lease terms from 50 to 66 years for the Airports Department and DWP matches the Harbor Department's existing authority. Longer terms give private investors the certainty needed to commit capital to major infrastructure projects.
  • Cost-Neutral to Taxpayers: The City Administrative Officer found the measure largely cost-neutral. The Public Access Investment Plan codifies an existing $28.6 million annual allocation, and workforce disclosures are self-funded by applicants, not by the City.
  • Watchpoint: Charter-Locked Spending: Embedding the Harbor Department's Public Access Investment Plan in the City Charter reduces future budgetary flexibility. While the Board of Harbor Commissioners retains discretion over the annual amount, reversing the mandate would require another citywide vote.
  • Watchpoint: New Disclosure Burden: The workforce impact disclosure requirement adds a compliance step for every Harbor District lease applicant. The City should ensure exemptions for small businesses are meaningful and that the process does not slow lease approvals or deter investment at the Port.
  • Smarter Airport Governance: Increasing the number of Airport Commissioners who must live near LAX (from one to three) and near Van Nuys Airport (from one to two) gives affected communities a stronger voice on the board overseeing their airports.

See your full ballot

Get a personalized voter guide with every endorsed race + measure on your June 2 ballot.

Get your full voter guide